ISSN 1003-8035 CN 11-2852/P
    WANG Dongwei, YOU Yong, LI Daoling, et al. The river blockage characteristics of “8·20” large-scale debris flow and the hazard prediction in Banzi gully in Miansi Town,Wenchuan County[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2022, 33(1): 58-66. DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2022.01-07
    Citation: WANG Dongwei, YOU Yong, LI Daoling, et al. The river blockage characteristics of “8·20” large-scale debris flow and the hazard prediction in Banzi gully in Miansi Town,Wenchuan County[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2022, 33(1): 58-66. DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2022.01-07

    The river blockage characteristics of “8·20” large-scale debris flow and the hazard prediction in Banzi gully in Miansi Town,Wenchuan County

    More Information
    • Received Date: May 24, 2021
    • Revised Date: July 27, 2021
    • Available Online: March 06, 2022
    • After Wenchuan earthquake, many large debris flow have occur in Banzi Gully. Especially in 2019, the "8·20" debris flow caused serious damage to the roads, bridges and villages in the gully mouth, mail river was seriously squeeaed to the other side and there is a big risk of blocking the river in the future. Based on the field investigation and comprehensive analysis of the basic characteristics and formation conditions of the debris flow, the characteristics of river blockage are analyzed, the parameters of river blockage under different debris flow frequency are calculated, and the possible impact of dam-breaking flood under each frequency on Miansi Town is predicted. The results show that debris flow with frequencies of 2%, 5% and 10% are less likely to cause river blockage of Min River, and if there was a river blocking event , the town of Miansi would not be exposed to dam-breaking flood. The debris flow with a frequency of 1% are likely to cause river blockage. The debris flow material with a volume of 57.38×104 m3 can reach the Min River to form a dam with a height of about 51.61 m. Under the action of the main river flood (1890.0 m3/s), the dam will be broken, and the peak flow rate of the flood was 5935.49 m3/s, which dropped to 2312.25 m3/s while arrive at Miansi Town. Since the flood depth (4.00 m) is higher than the height of the protective embankment (3.5 m), the flood is likely to damage the houses near the protective embankment of Miansi Town.This paper provided a reference for the analysis of the characteristics of large-scale debris flow blockage in the future, as well as the possible impact of the collapse flood on downstream towns.
    • [1]
      谢洪, 钟敦伦, 矫震, 等. 2008年汶川地震重灾区的泥石流[J]. 山地学报,2009,27(4):501 − 509. [XIE Hong, ZHONG Dunlun, JIAO Zhen, et al. Debris flow in Wenchuan quake-hit area in 2008[J]. Journal of Mountain Science,2009,27(4):501 − 509. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2786.2009.04.017
      [2]
      庄建琦, 崔鹏, 葛永刚, 等. “5·12”地震后都汶公路沿线泥石流沟危险性评价[J]. 四川大学学报(工程科学版),2009,41(3):131 − 139. [ZHUANG Jianqi, CUI Peng, GE Yonggang, et al. Hazard assessment of debris flow valleys along Dujiangyan-Wenchuan highway after “5·12” Wenchuan devastating earthquake[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Engineering Science Edition),2009,41(3):131 − 139. (in Chinese with English abstract)
      [3]
      CUI P, HU K H, ZHUANG J Q, et al. Prediction of debris-flow danger area by combining hydrological and inundation simulation methods[J]. Journal of Mountain Science,2011,8(1):1 − 9. DOI: 10.1007/s11629-011-2040-8
      [4]
      余斌, 谢洪, 王士革, 等. 汶川县泥石流沟在汶川“5·12”地震后的活动趋势[J]. 自然灾害学报,2011,20(6):68 − 73. [YU Bin, XIE Hong, WANG Shige, et al. Activity tendency of debris flow gully in Wenchuan County after “5·12” Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters,2011,20(6):68 − 73. (in Chinese with English abstract)
      [5]
      周荣军, 蒲晓虹, 何玉林, 等. 四川岷江断裂带北段的新活动、岷山断块的隆起及其与地震活动的关系[J]. 地震地质,2000,22(3):285 − 294. [ZHOU Rongjun, PU Xiaohong, HE Yulin, et al. Recent activity of Minjiang fault zone, uplift of Minshan block and their relationship with seismicity of Sichuan[J]. Seismology and Geology,2000,22(3):285 − 294. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2000.03.009
      [6]
      杨成林, 陈宁生, 李战鲁. 汶川地震次生泥石流形成模式与机理[J]. 自然灾害学报,2011,20(3):31 − 37. [YANG Chenglin, CHEN Ningsheng, LI Zhanlu. Formation mode and mechanism fordebris flow induced by Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters,2011,20(3):31 − 37. (in Chinese with English abstract)
      [7]
      张会平, 杨农, 张岳桥, 等. 岷江水系流域地貌特征及其构造指示意义[J]. 第四纪研究,2006,26(1):126 − 135. [ZHANG Huiping, YANG Nong, ZHANG Yueqiao, et al. Geomorphology of the Minjiang drainage system (Sichuan, China) and its structural implications[J]. Quaternary Sciences,2006,26(1):126 − 135. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7410.2006.01.016
      [8]
      谭万沛. 中国暴雨泥石流预报研究基本理论与现状[J]. 土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1996,10(1):88 − 95. [TAN Wanpei. Basic theory and study situation of rainstorm debris flow forecastin China[J]. Journal of Soil Erosion and Soil Conservation,1996,10(1):88 − 95. (in Chinese with English abstract)
      [9]
      TANG C, ZHU J, LI W L, et al. Rainfall-triggered debris flows following the Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment,2009,68(2):187 − 194. DOI: 10.1007/s10064-009-0201-6
      [10]
      唐川, 梁京涛. 汶川震区北川9·24暴雨泥石流特征研究[J]. 工程地质学报,2008,16(6):751 − 758. [TANG Chuan, LIANG Jingtao. Characteristics of debris flows in Beichuan epicenter of the Wenchuan earthquake triggered by rainstorm on September 24, 2008[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2008,16(6):751 − 758. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2008.06.004
      [11]
      倪化勇, 郑万模, 唐业旗, 等. 绵竹清平8·13群发泥石流成因、特征与发展趋势[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2011,38(3):129 − 133. [NI Huayong, ZHENG Wanmo, TANG Yeqi, et al. Formation, characteristics and trend of the group debris flows occurred on August 13 in Qingping, Mianzhu County[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2011,38(3):129 − 133. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3665.2011.03.024
      [12]
      余斌. 根据泥石流沉积物计算泥石流容重的方法研究[J]. 沉积学报,2008,26(5):789 − 796. [YU Bin. Research on the calculating density by the deposit of debris flows[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2008,26(5):789 − 796. (in Chinese with English abstract)
      [13]
      中华人民共和国国土资源部. 泥石流灾害防治工程勘查规范: DZ/T 0220—2006[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2006.

      Ministry of Land and Resources of the People's Republic of China. Specification of geological investigation for debris flow stabilization: DZ/T 0220—2006[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2006. (in Chinese)
      [14]
      四川省水利电力厅. 四川省中小流域暴雨洪水计算手册[M]. 1984.

      Sichuan Provincial Water Resources Department. The rainstorm-flood calculation manual for middle and small catchment in Sichuan Province[M]. 1984. (in Chinese)
      [15]
      周必凡, 李德基, 罗德富, 等. 泥石流防治指南[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1991: 92 − 93.

      ZHOU Bifan, LI Deji, LUO Defu, et al. Guide to prevention of debris flow [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1991. (in Chinese)
      [16]
      陈泽硕. 泥石流入汇主河后水—泥流特征研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2016.

      CHEN Zeshuo. Study on characteristics of flow and sediment when debris flow confluence with the main river[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2016. (in Chinese with English abstract)
      [17]
      陈德明, 王兆印, 何耘. 泥石流入汇对河流影响的实验研究[J]. 泥沙研究,2002(3):22 − 28. [CHEN Deming, WANG Zhaoyin, HE Yun. Experimental study on the fluvial process of debris flow discharging into a river[J]. Journal of Sediment Research,2002(3):22 − 28. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0468-155X.2002.03.004
      [18]
      向灵芝, 崔鹏, 钟敦伦, 等. 汶川地震区泥石流危害道路的定量分析: 以汶川县肖家沟为例[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2012,47(3):387 − 393. [XIANG Lingzhi, CUI Peng, ZHONG Dunlun, et al. Quantitative hazard assessment of road debris flow in Wenchuan earthquake area: a case study of Xiaojia ravine in Wenchuan County[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University,2012,47(3):387 − 393. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2012.03.006
      [19]
      张金山, 谢洪. 岷江上游泥石流堵河可能性的经验公式判别[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2008,17(4):651 − 655. [ZHANG Jinshan, XIE Hong. Calculation of the possibility of river-blocking due to debris flow in the upper reaches of Minjiang river[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2008,17(4):651 − 655. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8227.2008.04.028
      [20]
      陈春光, 姚令侃, 刘翠容, 等. 泥石流堵河条件的研究[J]. 水利学报,2013,44(6):648 − 656. [CHEN Chunguang, YAO Lingkan, LIU Cuirong, et al. Study on conditions of river-blocking due to debris flow[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,2013,44(6):648 − 656. (in Chinese with English abstract)
      [21]
      朱勇辉, 廖鸿志, 吴中如. 国外土坝溃坝模拟综述[J]. 长江科学院院报,2003,20(2):26 − 29. [ZHU Yonghui, LIAO Hongzhi, WU Zhongru. Review on oversea earth-dam-break modeling[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute,2003,20(2):26 − 29. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5485.2003.02.008
      [22]
      YOU Y, LIU J, CHEN X. Design of sluiceway channel in a landslide dam triggered by the Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Disaster Advances,2012,5(4):241 − 249.
      [23]
      LIU J F, YOU Y, CHEN X Q, et al. Characteristics and hazard prediction of large-scale debris flow of Xiaojia Gully in Yingxiu Town, Sichuan Province, China[J]. Engineering Geology,2014,180:55 − 67. DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.03.017
      [24]
      许晓君, 胡卸文, 许泽鹏, 等. 四川壤塘县石吾陇沟泥石流启动条件与堵河程度分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2019,30(3):44 − 53. [XU Xiaojun, HU Xiewen, XU Zepeng, et al. Incipient Shiwalong gully, motion condition and river-blocking possibility of debris flow, Rangtang County, Sichuan Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2019,30(3):44 − 53. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    • Related Articles

      [1]Zhiwei YAN, Chang SU, Guodong ZHANG, Zhihua XU, Xiaohong YANG, Chen ZHANG, Can SHENG. Analysis on the distribution and formation mechanism of ground collapse in gypsum mining area in Yingcheng of Hubei Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2025, 36(1): 57-64. DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202307031
      [2]Pengying YI, Junzhi LIN, Tao CHEN, Zhiyong WU. Mechanism of bending-sideslip of inclined thick bedding slope: A case study of Qingkou landslide in Wulong, Chongqing[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2024, 35(3): 36-42. DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202212014
      [3]Zi WANG, Dong WANG, Shuai JIANG, Yanjun LI, Peiyuan AN. Analysis on deformation mechanism of the Lingwan Village landslide in Shaanxi Province section of the West-East Gas Pipeline Project[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2023, 34(3): 8-19. DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202209012
      [4]Jianjun ZHAO. Analysis on development characteristics and formation mechanism of karst collapse in Shakou Town, Yingde City of Guandong Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2022, 33(5): 59-65. DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202109018
      [5]Xiaobo KANG, Yu WANG, Hua ZHANG, Xusheng DAI, Guangyi ZHU. Characteristics and formation mechanism of karst collapse in Yunnan Plateau[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2022, 33(5): 50-58. DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202202061
      [6]Gang WEI, Zhiqiang YIN, Yinfei LUO, Liqin WAN, Chunxiao LI. Analysis on the accumulation deposits characteristics and formation mechanism of Kangyang landslide in the upper reaches of Yellow River[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2022, 33(2): 1-8. DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2022.02-01
      [7]He YANG, Minggao TANG, Qiang XU, Zhengfeng GONG, Quan ZHU. Recent deformation characteristics and mechanism of the Shiliushubao landslide in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2022, 33(1): 67-74. DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2022.01-08
      [8]Yuxiang CHENG, Buping ZHANG, Yaming TANG. The mechanism of bending-toppling loess collapse caused by headward erosion[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2021, 32(5): 86-91. DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2021.05-10
      [9]Qingding HAN, Xiyi LUO. Analysis on the formation mechanism and development process of karst collapses in Lijia Village, Gaoming District of Foshan City[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2021, 32(4): 56-64. DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2021.04-08
      [10]Xiannian JIANG, Chenyang ZHANG. Deformation characteristics and failure mechanism of large-scale obliquely dip rock landslide in the Three Gorges Reservoir Region[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2021, 32(2): 36-42. DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2021.02.05
    • Cited by

      Periodical cited type(10)

      1. 张磊, 周萌, 岳庆, 孙瑞显, 李小华. 北京市延庆区黄裕口滑坡稳定性特征及形成机制研究. 四川有色金属. 2025(02)
      2. 易垚,林翔,雷雪霏. 不等厚互层顺层滑坡典型工程案例研究. 江西建材. 2024(01): 201-203 .
      3. 傅强. 福州市晋安区地质灾害现状及防治对策. 海峡科学. 2024(09): 76-79 .
      4. 王林峰,夏万春,冉楗,张继旭,程平. 考虑库水升降和滑带弱化作用的岸坡启滑机制分析. 中国地质灾害与防治学报. 2023(02): 30-41 . 本站查看
      5. 周亚辉,庞鑫. 广汉市红层地区滑坡地质灾害形成机制. 科学技术创新. 2022(02): 141-144 .
      6. 周健,刘港. 基于模糊综合评价法的凤鸣镇滑坡危险性评价. 科学咨询(科技·管理). 2022(05): 113-116 .
      7. 胡屿,刘勇,侯江勇. 基于GIS的贵州省丹寨县斜坡结构自动化制图方法分析. 安徽地质. 2022(02): 182-187 .
      8. 张鹏,唐雪梅,李虎,刘思铭. 滑坡作用下X80腐蚀管道的极限宽度分析. 中国地质灾害与防治学报. 2022(04): 47-54 . 本站查看
      9. 胡屿,张楠,吴东燃,陈亚,何辉. 贵州金海湖新区田湾子滑坡活动特征及成因机理分析. 中国地质灾害与防治学报. 2022(05): 11-19 . 本站查看
      10. 邵彬涛. 关于高校线上线下混合式教学的应用研究. 科学咨询(教育科研). 2022(09): 107-109 .

      Other cited types(2)

    Catalog

      Article views (281) PDF downloads (171) Cited by(12)

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return