ISSN 1003-8035 CN 11-2852/P
    GUO Fuyun, ZHOU Xiaolong, HUO Feibiao, et al. Study on the disaster effect and prevention countermeasures of landslide in Zhouqu fault zone[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2022, 33(6): 80-89. DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202202038
    Citation: GUO Fuyun, ZHOU Xiaolong, HUO Feibiao, et al. Study on the disaster effect and prevention countermeasures of landslide in Zhouqu fault zone[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2022, 33(6): 80-89. DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202202038

    Study on the disaster effect and prevention countermeasures of landslide in Zhouqu fault zone

    More Information
    • Received Date: February 22, 2022
    • Revised Date: April 12, 2022
    • Available Online: October 20, 2022
    • Zhouqu is one of the areas with the most serious landslide disasters in China, in which the fault zone landslide are frequent and the harm is huge. Based on the comprehensive remote sensing, deformation monitoring and field investigation, this paper studies the reactivation characteristics and disaster-causing mode of fault zone landslide, and puts forward the prevention and control countermeasures. The results show that: (1) the landslide in the fault zone is mainly in a strip shape and dustpan shape; The sliding body and sliding bed are generally composed of slate, phyllite and rubble, and the sliding zone soil is pebbly clay; The landslide has the characteristics of multi-level and block activity, and the differential sliding characteristics of different blocks are significant; Landslide is generally slow sliding and has fluidity characteristics; Landslide has the characteristics of rainfall sensitivity, and the response of deep landslide to rainfall has obvious lag. (2) the disaster modes of landslides in fault zone are mainly creep, tension crack effect and impact push effect in the process of slow sliding, river blocking and flooding effect, extrusion erosion effect and social impact effect after sliding. (3) the landslide conditions are large and the treatment measures are difficult to get together. However, its sudden nature is not strong, so it should focus on management and prevention. The recommended prevention measures are land use control, monitoring and early warning, risk avoidance and relocation, and engineering treatment measures are not recommended.
    • [1]
      苏琦,梁明剑,袁道阳,等. 白龙江流域构造地貌特征及其对滑坡泥石流灾害的控制作用[J]. 地球科学,2016,41(10):1758 − 1770. [SU Qi,LIANG Mingjian,YUAN Daoyang,et al. Geomorphic features of the Bailongjiang River drainage basin and its relationship with geological disaster[J]. Earth Science,2016,41(10):1758 − 1770. (in Chinese with English abstract)
      [2]
      陈冠,孟兴民,郭鹏,等. 白龙江流域基于GIS与信息量模型的滑坡危险性等级区划[J]. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2011,47(6):1 − 6. [CHEN Guan,MENG Xingmin,GUO Peng,et al. Landslide susceptibility mapping based on GIS and information value model in Bailong River basin[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences),2011,47(6):1 − 6. (in Chinese with English abstract)
      [3]
      李淑贞,戴霜,王华伟,等. 白龙江地区断裂构造与滑坡分布及发生关系[J]. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2015,51(2):145 − 152. [LI Shuzhen,DAI Shuang,WANG Huawei,et al. Fault features and their implications on distribution and formation of landslides in Bailongjiang Region[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences),2015,51(2):145 − 152. (in Chinese with English abstract)
      [4]
      杨为民,黄晓,张春山,等. 白龙江流域坪定—化马断裂带滑坡特征及其形成演化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2014,44(2):574 − 583. [YANG Weimin,HUANG Xiao,ZHANG Chunshan,et al. Deformation behavior of landslides and their formation mechanism along Pingding-Huama active fault in Bailongjiang River region[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition),2014,44(2):574 − 583. (in Chinese with English abstract)
      [5]
      余志山. 泄流坡滑坡灾害损失预测及成灾方式研究[J]. 甘肃科技,2007,23(12):72 − 76. [YU Zhishan. Study on disaster loss prediction and disaster mode of xieliupo landslide[J]. Gansu Science and Technology,2007,23(12):72 − 76. (in Chinese) DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0952.2007.12.027
      [6]
      蒋树,文宝萍,赵成,等. 甘肃舟曲泄流坡滑坡活动机理分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2013,24(3):1 − 7. [JIANG Shu,WEN Baoping,ZHAO Cheng,et al. Creep mechanism analysis of Xieliupo landslide in Zhouqu County of Gansu Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2013,24(3):1 − 7. (in Chinese with English abstract)
      [7]
      张卫雄,翟向华,丁保艳,等. 甘肃舟曲江顶崖滑坡成因分析与综合治理措施[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2020,31(5):7 − 14. [ZHANG Weixiong,ZHAI Xianghua,DING Baoyan,et al. Causative analysis and comprehensive treatment of the Jiangdingya landslide in Zhouqu County of Gansu Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2020,31(5):7 − 14. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2020.05.02
      [8]
      窦晓东,张泽林. 甘肃舟曲垭豁口滑坡复活机理及成因探讨[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2021,32(2):9 − 18. [DOU Xiaodong,ZHANG Zelin. Mechanism and causal analysis on the Yahuokou landslide reactivation and causes(Zhouqu County,Gansu,China)[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2021,32(2):9 − 18. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2021.02.02
      [9]
      蒋树,文宝萍,黎志恒,等. 甘肃舟曲锁儿头滑坡活动特征分析[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2016,43(2):69 − 74. [JIANG Shu,WEN Baoping,LI Zhiheng,et al. An analysis of the activity features of the Suoertou landslide in Zhouqu County of Gansu[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2016,43(2):69 − 74. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.2016.02.10
      [10]
      宿星,吴玮江,叶伟林,等. 甘肃舟曲县龙江新村滑坡特征及稳定性[J]. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2014,50(1):7 − 14. [SU Xing,WU Weijiang,YE Weilin,et al. Characteristics and stability assessment of Longjiangxincun landslide in Zhouqu County,Gansu Province[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences),2014,50(1):7 − 14. (in Chinese with English abstract)
      [11]
      焦赟,姚正学,董耀刚. 舟曲南桥滑坡稳定性分析及治理对策研究[J]. 甘肃地质,2012,21(1):59 − 63. [JIAO Yun,YAO Zhengxue,DONG Yaogang. Nanqiao landslide stability and countermeasures in Zhouqu[J]. Gansu Geology,2012,21(1):59 − 63. (in Chinese with English abstract)
      [12]
      蒋秀姿,文宝萍,蒋树,等. 甘肃舟曲锁儿头滑坡活动的主控因素分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2015,45(6):1798 − 1807. [JIANG Xiuzi,WEN Baoping,JIANG Shu,et al. Main factors analysis for controlling kinematic behavior of Suoertou landslide[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition),2015,45(6):1798 − 1807. (in Chinese with English abstract)
      [13]
      黄晓,杨为民,张春山,等. 舟曲泄流坡滑坡变形特征及其形成机理[J]. 地质力学学报,2013,19(2):178 − 187. [HUANG Xiao,YANG Weimin,ZHANG Chunshan,et al. Deformation characteristics and formation mechanism of xieliupo landslide in Zhouqu[J]. Journal of Geomechanics,2013,19(2):178 − 187. (in Chinese with English abstract)
      [14]
      郭长宝,任三绍,李雪,等. 甘肃舟曲南峪江顶崖古滑坡发育特征与复活机理[J]. 现代地质,2019,33(1):206 − 217. [GUO Changbao,REN Sanshao,LI Xue,et al. Development characteristics and reactivation mechanism of the jiangdingya ancient landslide in the Nanyu town,Zhouqu County,Gansu Province[J]. Geoscience,2019,33(1):206 − 217. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI: 10.19657/j.geoscience.1000-8527.2019.01.20
      [15]
      刘秋强,杜岩,郭富赟,等. 青藏高原东端甘肃舟曲牙豁口滑坡复活机理研究[J]. 灾害学,2021,36(2):113 − 117. [LIU Qiuqiang,DU Yan,GUO Fuyun,et al. The reactivation mechanism of yahuokou landslide at the eastern end of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau,Zhouqu County,Gansu Province,China[J]. Journal of Catastrophology,2021,36(2):113 − 117. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-811X.2021.02.019
      [16]
      韩旭东,付杰,李严严,等. 舟曲江顶崖滑坡的早期判识及风险评估研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2021,48(6):180 − 186. [HAN Xudong,FU Jie,LI Yanyan,et al. A study of the early identification and risk assessment of the Jiangdingya landslide in Zhouqu County[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2021,48(6):180 − 186. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202104028
      [17]
      刘东飞,王雄师,杨欢,等. 基于可靠度分析的甘肃舟曲泄流坡滑坡风险评价[J]. 山地学报,2017,35(3):323 − 331. [LIU Dongfei,WANG Xiongshi,YANG Huan,et al. Risk assessment of Zhouqu xieliupo landslide based on reliability analysis in Zhouqu County of Gansu Province[J]. Mountain Research,2017,35(3):323 − 331. (in Chinese with English abstract)
      [18]
      贾虎军,王立娟,范冬丽. 无人机载LiDAR和倾斜摄影技术在地质灾害隐患早期识别中的应用[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2021,32(2):60 − 65. [JIA Hujun,WANG Lijuan,FAN Dongli. The application of UAV LiDAR and tilt photography in the early identification of geo-hazards[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2021,32(2):60 − 65. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2021.02.08
      [19]
      刘文,王猛,朱赛楠,等. 基于光学遥感技术的高山极高山区高位地质灾害链式特征分析—以金沙江上游典型堵江滑坡为例[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2021,32(5):29 − 39. [LIU Wen,WANG Meng,ZHU Sainan,et al. An analysis on chain characteristics of highstand geological disasters in high mountains and extremely high mountains based on optical remote sensing technology:A case study of representative large landslides in upper reach of Jinsha River[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2021,32(5):29 − 39. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2021.05-04
      [20]
      潘建平,邓福江,徐正宣,等. 基于轨道精炼控制点精选的极艰险区域时序InSAR地表形变监测[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2021,32(5):98 − 104. [PAN Jianping,DENG Fujiang,XU Zhengxuan,et al. Time series InSAR surface deformation monitoring in extremely difficult area based on track refining control points selection[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2021,32(5):98 − 104. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2021.05-12
      [21]
      褚宏亮,邢顾莲,李昆仲,等. 基于地面三维激光扫描的三峡库区危岩体监测[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2021,48(4):124 − 132. [CHU Hongliang,XING Gulian,LI Kunzhong,et al. Monitoring of dangerous rock mass in the Three Gorges Reservoir area based on the terrestrial laser scanning methodFull text replacement[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2021,48(4):124 − 132. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202008015
      [22]
      侯燕军,周小龙,石鹏卿,等. “空-天-地”一体化技术在滑坡隐患早期识别中的应用—以兰州普兰太公司滑坡为例[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2020,31(6):12 − 20. [HOU Yanjun,ZHOU Xiaolong,SHI Pengqing,et al. Application of “Air-Space-Ground” integrated technology in early identification of landslide hidden danger:Taking Lanzhou Pulantai Company Landslide as an example[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2020,31(6):12 − 20. (in Chinese with English abstract)
      [23]
      俞晶星,郑文俊,袁道阳,等. 西秦岭西段光盖山-迭山断裂带坪定-化马断裂的新活动性与滑动速率[J]. 第四纪研究,2012,32(5):957 − 967. [YU Jingxing,ZHENG Wenjun,YUAN Daoyang,et al. Late quaternary active characteristics and slip-rate of pingdinghuama fault,the eastern segment of Guanggaishan-Dieshan fault zone(west Qinling Mountain)[J]. Quaternary Sciences,2012,32(5):957 − 967. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7410.2012.05.13
      [24]
      陈宗良,叶振南,王志宏,等. 白龙江流域中上游第四纪沉积物的发育特征及其灾害效应[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2019,46(2):29 − 36. [CHEN Zongliang,YE Zhennan,WANG Zhihong,et al. Development characteristics and disaster effect of the Quaternary sediments in the middle and upper reaches of the Bailongiang River basin[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2019,46(2):29 − 36. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.2019.02.05
      [25]
      陈明,王运生,梁瑞锋,等. 白龙江流域大型滑坡发育分布规律研究[J]. 工程地质学报,2018,26(2):325 − 333. [CHEN Ming,WANG Yunsheng,LIANG Ruifeng,et al. Research on development and distribution rules of largescale landslides in Bailongjiang River basin[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2018,26(2):325 − 333. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2017-037
    • Related Articles

      [1]Linfeng WANG, Hui JIANG, Ning TANG, Xiaoming HUANG, Guojin TAN. Three-dimensional reconstruction and structural surface identification of high steep slopes based on UAV close-range photogrammetry[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2025, 36(1): 92-100. DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202309014
      [2]Hao CHEN, Honggang WU, Qing CHEN. Study on the method for determining the position of landslide slip surface based on “D” type inclinometer curve[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2024, 35(4): 93-105. DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202210031
      [3]Dong WANG, Jinyao LIU, Guanghe LI, Xiaoyu XING, Xiaohu ZHENG, Jiaqi ZHAO, Guoliang WU. Open-pit mine soft rock slope internal row tracking pressure side control engineering:A case study at the south side of the first mining area of Hesigewula south open-pit coal mine[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2024, 35(3): 80-87. DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202210019
      [4]Wei LU, Bin YANG, Kun YANG. Surface deformation monitoring and analysis of Southwest University of Science and Technology based on time series InSAR[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2023, 34(2): 61-72. DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202202060
      [5]Shirong DENG, Shiguo XIAO. Calculation method of stabilizing piles with broadened top at the built-in section[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2022, 33(4): 84-91. DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202107006
      [6]Jianping PAN, Fujiang DENG, Zhengxuan XU, Qiwen XIANG, Wenli TU, Zhanbao FU. Time series InSAR surface deformation monitoring in extremely difficult area based on track refining control points selection[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2021, 32(5): 98-104. DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2021.05-12
      [7]Xisheng DENG, Yuan ZHANG, Yu TANG. Investigation on slope rainfall threshold surface based on failure probablolity[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2021, 32(3): 70-75. DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2021.03-09
      [8]Rongkun CAI, Zihang DAI, Genlian XU, Changjiang HU. Influence of rainfall on sliding modes of cutting slope of weathered granite stratum: Taking Yunxiao section in the Yunping freeway in Fujian for example[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2021, 32(2): 27-35. DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2021.02.04
      [9]LIU Xiaoyu, FAN Zhiyong, WU Jiang. Evolution of deformation and monitoring techniques of surface tilt for soil landslides using MEMS technique[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2020, 31(6): 69-77. DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2020.06.09
    • Cited by

      Periodical cited type(52)

      1. 刘传正,米文忠,黄帅. 论灾害事故预防应对的调查评估问题. 灾害学. 2025(01): 1-7+85 .
      2. 曹禄来,瞿帅,万红军,余鹏琪,陈舒阳. 岗丘谷地弃土场倒葫芦形滑坡原因分析及处治措施. 路基工程. 2025(01): 213-218 .
      3. 张新,王建文,方舒,李敏. 基于随机场理论的多组分弃渣场可靠度研究. 山西建筑. 2025(07): 6-11 .
      4. 邓锡保,宋欣,马蕾梦醒,刘建友,张振波,陈亚东. 隧道弃渣场格宾生态挡墙碳排放分析及减碳技术. 铁道标准设计. 2024(06): 114-120 .
      5. 张清,何毅,陈学业,高秉海,张立峰,赵占骜,路建刚,张雅蕾. 基于多尺度卷积神经网络的深圳市滑坡易发性评价. 中国地质灾害与防治学报. 2024(04): 146-162 . 本站查看
      6. 钟兴荣. 低势能滑坡束口聚能启程剧动机制研究——以深圳光明新区红坳建筑弃渣场滑坡为例. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2024(10): 2485-2496 .
      7. 李蔚霖. 贵州山区软基型弃渣场失稳机理探究. 交通科技. 2024(05): 62-65 .
      8. 刘传正,王建新. 崩塌滑坡泥石流灾害链分类研究. 工程地质学报. 2024(05): 1573-1596 .
      9. 聂峰,史超. 西南地区生产建设项目弃渣场水土保持现状. 长江技术经济. 2024(05): 31-37 .
      10. 夏清,窦志荣,尹小涛. 山区公路典型弃渣边坡灾变机制和综合安全控制技术. 施工技术(中英文). 2023(04): 29-33+38 .
      11. 王晓伟,朱兴旺,李卓. 矿山排土场边坡稳定性影响因素分析. 西部探矿工程. 2023(06): 11-14 .
      12. 许宁,陈铭,蔺威威,边涛,杜旭东,简东明. 泥岩地层盾构渣土免烧砖制备技术研究. 新型建筑材料. 2023(06): 80-82+94 .
      13. 沈剑羽,肖建庄,高琦,王浩通. 工程弃土复配及再生砖性能试验. 应用基础与工程科学学报. 2023(04): 990-1005 .
      14. 廖江林,黄家华. 压力注浆钢管桩在运营高速公路膨胀土路堤滑坡处治中的应用. 西部交通科技. 2022(10): 80-83 .
      15. 高琦,肖建庄,沈剑羽. 园林垃圾对工程弃土烧结砖性能的影响. 建筑材料学报. 2022(11): 1195-1202 .
      16. 李沁书,温家华,柴建峰,周喜军,闫宾,凌超. 抽水蓄能电站弃渣场勘察设计中若干问题的探讨. 水电与抽水蓄能. 2021(02): 90-94 .
      17. 王开科,闫浩静,赵国情,冯兴伟,张磊,何承浩. 极端暴雨工况下弃渣场稳定性分析. 中国水运(下半月). 2021(06): 153-155 .
      18. 洪振宇,何玉琼,李明,孙荣,朱莎莎. 降雨-地震耦合作用下某大型弃渣场稳定性分析. 矿业研究与开发. 2021(06): 43-47 .
      19. 王树英,占永杰,杨秀竹,付循伟,令凡琳. 淤泥质粉质黏土地层盾构渣土免烧空心砖固化机理与质量评价. 北京工业大学学报. 2021(07): 710-718 .
      20. 徐龙旺. 沿河膨胀填(弃)土滑坡群成因机制分析及处治研究. 西部交通科技. 2021(05): 24-27 .
      21. 刘志明. 弃渣场扩容条件下渣体边坡稳定性影响因素研究. 铁道建筑技术. 2021(08): 24-27+55 .
      22. 薛青松. 自密水泥土在基坑肥槽回填工程的现场试验研究. 江西建材. 2021(12): 28-30 .
      23. 王开科,闫浩静,赵国情,冯兴伟,张磊,何承浩. 极端暴雨工况下弃渣场稳定性分析. 中国水运(下半月). 2021(12): 153-155 .
      24. 肖建宇,谢忠勇,张著伦. 挡墙基底换填对弃土场边坡稳定性影响分析. 地质灾害与环境保护. 2020(01): 81-86 .
      25. 姚天雨,赵建平. 基于STAMP模型的深圳“12·20”滑坡事故致因分析. 系统科学学报. 2020(02): 73-78+89 .
      26. 郭小雨,陈枝东,裴立宅,李家茂,樊传刚. 改性矿渣水泥-渣土免烧砖的制备与性能表征. 新型建筑材料. 2020(05): 75-79 .
      27. 彭庆华,朱绍奇,张胜勇. 滑坡削坡卸载综合整治技术研究. 四川建筑. 2020(02): 118-119+122 .
      28. 邱海军,马舒悦,崔一飞,杨冬冬,裴艳茜,刘子敬. 重新认识滑坡作用. 西北大学学报(自然科学版). 2020(03): 377-385 .
      29. 林文华,叶诚耿,王浩. 考虑堆填界面软化及地下水位波动的大型弃渣场边坡稳定性分析. 铁道建筑. 2020(05): 84-88 .
      30. 王良民,郭向前,奚春华,李勇,程起敏. 实景三维地质灾害管理信息平台的设计与实现. 地理空间信息. 2020(08): 7-9+30+6 .
      31. 王盈,曾江波,姚文敏,李长冬. 基于可靠度理论的阻滑键加固渣土边坡多目标优化设计方法. 中国地质灾害与防治学报. 2020(05): 88-97 . 本站查看
      32. 陈柯霖,卿伟宸,朱勇. 浅论环保新形势下艰险山区弃渣场系统设计. 高速铁路技术. 2020(05): 87-91 .
      33. 谢亦红,尹祖超,李亮,蔡鹏. 砂土静动力液化特性的数值模拟. 公路交通科技. 2020(12): 33-39 .
      34. 柴建峰,周喜军,江献玉,刘殿海,王震洲,凌超,闫宾,李沁书. 固体废弃物堆场深层缓倾角推移式破坏实例分析. 水电与抽水蓄能. 2020(06): 73-77+85 .
      35. 高杨,卫童瑶,李滨,贺凯,刘铮,王学良. 深圳“12.20”渣土场远程流化滑坡动力过程分析. 水文地质工程地质. 2019(01): 129-138+147 .
      36. 张睿骁,樊晓一,姜元俊. 滑坡碎屑流冲击拦挡结构的离散元模拟. 水文地质工程地质. 2019(01): 148-155 .
      37. 王韬,叶咸,吴晓南. 浅议西南山区高速公路弃渣场工程. 公路交通科技(应用技术版). 2019(01): 110-114 .
      38. 王昱,闫宾,曹畅,柴建峰. 弃渣体潜在失稳滑动面探讨. 水电与抽水蓄能. 2019(04): 106-112 .
      39. 沈明祥,罗红明,刘志鹏,穆日盛,彭坤杰. 贵州省六盘水至威宁高速公路弃土场稳定性评估. 中国岩溶. 2019(04): 559-564 .
      40. 曾江波,杨龙,姚文敏,肖林超,鲁健. 基于非线性规划的渣土边坡坡形优化. 中国地质灾害与防治学报. 2019(06): 105-112 . 本站查看
      41. 余东亮,王庆,王爱玲,吴东容,吴森. 西南山区管道某典型滑坡变形演化研究. 油气田地面工程. 2019(12): 65-69 .
      42. 李明阳,柴建峰. 浅析弃渣体设计参数. 水电与抽水蓄能. 2018(03): 103-105 .
      43. 龚鹏,张洪岩. 深圳市地质灾害详细调查工作思路与建议. 中国矿业. 2018(09): 36-40 .
      44. 陈鹏飞,姜文杰,魏益平,陈阳. 水位变化与降雨耦合条件下四川某渣场边坡稳定性研究. 山西建筑. 2018(35): 73-75 .
      45. 刘传正. 论崩塌滑坡—碎屑流高速远程问题. 地质论评. 2017(06): 1563-1575 .
      46. 刘传正. 论地质灾害风险识别问题. 水文地质工程地质. 2017(04): 1-7 .
      47. 张一希,许强,彭大雷,赵宽耀,郭晨. 深圳“12·20”滑坡土体渗透性模拟试验研究. 水文地质工程地质. 2017(05): 131-136+149 .
      48. 赖国泉,任庆钊,张俊德. 甘肃兰州某黄土建筑高边坡失稳原因及补强治理方案. 中国地质灾害与防治学报. 2017(01): 36-42 . 本站查看
      49. 胡建华,黄超然,习智琴,杨春. 基于系统思考的深圳“12·20”滑坡事故分析及应对措施. 灾害学. 2017(01): 142-148 .
      50. 彭璐. 花岗岩地区滑坡特征及防治对策——以湖南省平江县花岗岩滑坡为例. 国土资源导刊. 2016(04): 20-24 .
      51. 柴建峰,王珏. 抽蓄工程弃渣场稳定性计算现状及问题分析. 山西建筑. 2016(27): 46-47 .
      52. 刘传正. 论地质灾害防治文化培育问题. 中国地质灾害与防治学报. 2016(03): 1-6 . 本站查看

      Other cited types(25)

    Catalog

      Article views (1515) PDF downloads (397) Cited by(77)

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return