• 中国科技核心期刊
  • 《中国科学引用文数据库》来源期刊
  • Caj-cd规范获奖期刊
欢迎扫码关注“i环境微平台”

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

桩板墙不同类型挂板的技术经济比较

李菊芳

李菊芳. 2021: 桩板墙不同类型挂板的技术经济比较. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 32(2): 135-142. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2021.02.18
引用本文: 李菊芳. 2021: 桩板墙不同类型挂板的技术经济比较. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 32(2): 135-142. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2021.02.18
Jufang LI. 2021: Technical and economic comparison for different types of hanging board method of pile sheet wall. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 32(2): 135-142. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2021.02.18
Citation: Jufang LI. 2021: Technical and economic comparison for different types of hanging board method of pile sheet wall. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 32(2): 135-142. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2021.02.18

桩板墙不同类型挂板的技术经济比较

doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2021.02.18
详细信息
    作者简介:

    李菊芳(1983-),女,陕西宝鸡人,硕士,工程师,主要从事地质灾害防治和工程造价方面的工作。E-mail:1062759551@qq.com

  • 中图分类号: P642.4

Technical and economic comparison for different types of hanging board method of pile sheet wall

  • 摘要: 桩板墙是边坡和滑坡治理工程中常用的支挡结构形式,不同类型的挂板方式在结构受力、经济效益和环境保护等方面有显著差异。针对西部山区城市土地开发过程中的工程滑坡治理问题,基于技术经济比选阐明了桩板墙挂板类型和适用性。以兰雅星河湾项目为依托,分析了该滑坡的变形特征和治理工程总体设计,重点对桩板墙挂板方式优化比选进行详细阐述。
  • 图  1  桩后挂板式桩板墙示意图和实例

    Figure  1.  Form and application example of the back hanging slab of the shoulder pile sheet wall pile

    图  2  桩前挂板式桩板墙示意图和实例

    Figure  2.  Form and application example of the front hanging slab of the cutting pile sheet wall pile

    图  3  桩间挂板式桩板墙示意图和实例

    Figure  3.  Form and application example of hanging slabs between piles and wall

    图  4  斜插式桩板墙示意图和实例

    Figure  4.  Form and application example of oblique inserted pile sheet wall pile

    图  5  滑坡全貌图

    Figure  5.  Landslide panorama

    图  6  治理工程布置平面和断面图

    Figure  6.  Layout plan and sectional view of project

    图  7  桩间挂板配筋图(单位: mm)

    Figure  7.  Reinforcement drawing of plate between piles(unit: mm)

    图  8  桩前挂板配筋图(单位: mm)

    Figure  8.  Reinforcement drawing of pile front plate (unit: mm)

    图  9  桩板墙施工过程

    Figure  9.  Construction process of sheet pile wall

    图  10  施工后照片

    Figure  10.  Photos after construction

    表  1  桩板墙类型及适用条件

    Table  1.   Types and applicable conditions of sheet pile wall

    类型挂板特征工程效果适用条件
    桩后挂板(1)挡土板置于桩背;(2)挡土板长度=桩净间距+搭接长度
    (3)挖方边坡中,土体开挖量过大,且开挖土体位于墙背及
    上部边坡坡脚,易引起山体扰动
    桩与桩之间空隙较大,影响道路美观多用于填方边坡
    桩前挂板(1)挡土板置于桩前;(2)挡土板长度可整板浇筑而成,
    预留相应伸缩缝;(3)土体开挖量不大,对山体扰动少
    需将桩体本身用素混凝土浇筑平顺,以图美观多用于挖方边坡
    桩间挂板(1)挡土板置于桩间;(2)挡土板长度=桩净间距;
    (3)土体开挖量介于桩后与桩前挂板之间,
    可引起小范围溜塌
    需将桩间挡土板端头间空隙用素混凝土浇筑平顺,以图美观多用于填、挖方边坡
    斜插板(1)挂板以一定的角度斜插于桩之间,夹角布置;
    (2)桩与板的连接有多种形式,可通过预埋钢筋连接
    或在桩上设置斜托或设置支撑块固定
    桩顶可设置植生槽种植藤蔓、垂吊植物,以提高桩板墙整体绿化效果多用于绿化要求高的填、挖方边坡
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  桩间挂板工程量及直接工程费表

    Table  2.   Analysis of quantities and direct engineering cost of hanging plate between piles

    工程名称:兰雅星河湾住宅小区8#楼北侧滑坡治理工程标段:未命名
    项目编码010101002003项目名称挖一般土方工程量799.5 m3
    定额编号定额名称定额单位数量单价/元合计/元
    人工费材料费机械费人工费材料费机械费
    1-9人工挖土方 四类土
    深度 1.5 m以内
    m31.0024.450.000.0024.450.000.00
    1-87土方运输 运输距离
    500~1000 m
    m31.006.110.0016.146.110.0016.14
    小计30.560.0016.14
    分项直接工程费合计/元46.70
    项目编码010505003003项目名称现浇C30混凝土挡土板工程量327.06 m3
    定额编号定额名称定额单位数量单价/元合计/元
    人工费材料费机械费人工费材料费机械费
    借3-357现浇混凝土构件
    挡土板 混凝土
    10 m30.10922.913487.430.0092.29348.740.00
    借3-358现浇混凝土构件
    挡土板 模板
    10 m20.59214.27215.1190.08125.95126.4452.95
    小计218.24475.1952.95
    分项直接工程费合计/元746.38
    项目编码010515001003项目名称现浇构件钢筋工程量59.24 t
    定额编号定额名称定额单位数量单价/元合计/元
    人工费材料费机械费人工费材料费机械费
    5-4现浇构件非预应力钢筋
    螺纹钢Ⅱ级
    t0.20695.44318.45116.61139.10863.8423.33
    5-5现浇构件非预应力钢筋
    螺纹钢Ⅲ级
    t0.80709.314506.67116.61567.423605.1893.28
    小计706.534469.02116.61
    分项直接工程费合计/元5292.16
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  桩前挡板直接工程费增量分析

    Table  3.   Direct engineering cost increment analysis

    序号项目名称增量计算方式单价直接工程费/元
    1挖一般土方−799.5 m3/46.70元/m3−37336.65
    2增加现浇挡土板(C30砼量)160.44 m3125 m×13 m×0.3 m(总体积)−327.06 m3(原工程量)746.38元/m3119749.21
    3增加现浇钢筋(Φ22、14钢筋)29.06 t88.3 t(参考原设计)−59.24 t(原工程量)5292.16元/t153790.17
    总计236202.73
    下载: 导出CSV
  • 董国良, 党立平, 廖文春. 地质灾害治理中边坡稳定问题及滑坡治理方法分析[J]. 工程建设与设计,2018(22):47 − 48. [DONG Guoliang, DANG Liping, LIAO Wenchun. Analysis of slope stability problems and landslide treatment methods in geological hazard control[J]. Engineering Construction and Design,2018(22):47 − 48. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    郑亮亮. 基于GIS的勉县滑坡危险性评价研究[D]. 西安: 西安科技大学, 2014.

    ZHENG Liangliang. GIS­based risk evaluation for landslide in Mianxian County [D]. Xi'an: Xi'an University of Science and Technology, 2014. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    杲斐. 黄土路堑边坡桩板墙桩间距研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2014.

    GAO Fei. Pile-sheet retaining wall spacing research in loess cutting slope[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou university, 2014. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    李婷, 肖世国. 考虑土拱效应的抗滑桩桩间挡土板压力计算方法[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2019,30(4):85 − 91. [LI Ting, XIAO Shiguo. Calculation method of earth pressure on retaining plates between adjacent stabilizing piles considering potential soil arching effect[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2019,30(4):85 − 91. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    黄治云. 抗滑桩桩间拱效应与桩板土压力研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2014.

    HUANG Zhiyun. Research of arch effect between Anti-slide piles and soil pressure on pile sheet[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing university, 2014. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    肖双松. 高速铁路陡坡地基路肩式桩板墙现场测试分析[D] 成都: 西南交通大学, 2013.

    XIAO Shuangsong. The scent test and analysis of shoulder type pile-plank wall on the sheep slope foundation of high-speed railway[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    张建云. 基于土拱效应的桩板墙与岩土体相互作用及其优化设计研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2017.

    ZHANG Jianyun.The interaction between sheet-pile wall and rock-soil body and its optimization research based on the soil arching effect[D]. Xi'an: Chang’an University, 2017. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    曹利宏. 深路堑桩板墙受力特性分析与优化设计研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州交通大学, 2019.

    CAO Lihong.Research on stress characteristic analysis and optimization design of deep cutting pile wall[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou Jiaotong University, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    张燕. 斜插式桩板墙在边坡支护中的运用[D]. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2008.

    ZHANG Yan.The application of sheet-pile retaining wall with prefabricated panels trough in slope[D].Chongqing: Chongqing jiaotong University, 2008. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    陈雷. 桩板式挡土墙在公路、市政工程中的优化研究[J]. 公路,2017,62(5):34 − 38. [CHEN Lei. Study on optimization of pile-slab retaining wall in highway and municipal engineering[J]. Highway,2017,62(5):34 − 38. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    李海光, 等. 新型支挡结构设计与工程实例[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2004.

    LI Haiguang, etal. Design and engineering example of new retaining structure[M]. Beijing: People's Communications Press, 2004. (in Chinese)
    朱必龙. 重庆建工市政交通工程有限责任公司-二环聚居区互联互通供水工程(西永段)青凤标段顺利进场[EB/OL]. (2019-12-02).http://www.cqszjt.com/news.asp?sid=14&id=1564.

    ZHU Bilong. Chongqing Construction Engineering Municipal Transportation Engineering Co. Ltd., - Qingfeng bid section of 2nd ring residential area interconnection water supply project (Xiyong section) successfully entered the site[EB/OL]. (2019-12-02). http://www.cqszjt.com/news.asp?sid=14&id=1564. (in Chinese)
    张志. 昆明军龙岩土工程有限公司-中梁大理壹号院项目动态图[EB/OL]. (2018-09-30). http://www.kmjlyt.com/case_show.aspx?id=6475

    ZHANG Zhi. Dynamic diagram of Kunming Junlong Geotechnical Engineering Co. Ltd., - Zhongliang Dali No.1 institute project[EB/OL]. (2018-09-30). http://www.kmjlyt.com/case_show.aspx?id=6475. (in Chinese)
    掌上五指山. 众志成城夺天工, 五指山下架彩虹!海南琼乐高速即将于9月底通[EB/OL]. (2018-09-23). https://www.sohu.com/a/255742062_751997.

    Wuzhishan on the palm. Work together to win Tiangong, Wuzhishan under the frame rainbow! Hainan qiongle expressway will be connected at the end of September[EB/OL]. (2018-09-23). https://www.sohu.com/a/255742062_751997. (in Chinese)
    中铁西北科学研究院有限公司. 兰雅·星河湾住宅小区8#楼北侧滑坡治理工程地质勘察报告[R]. 兰州: 2017.

    Northwest Research Institute Co. Ltd., of CREC. Eological investigation report on Landslide Treatment Engineering in the north of Building 8 of LANYA·Xinghewan residential district [R]. Lanzhou: 2017. (in Chinese)
    中铁西北科学研究院有限公司. 兰雅·星河湾住宅小区8#楼北侧滑坡治理工程施工图设计[R]. 兰州: 2017.

    Northwest Research Institute Co. Ltd., of CREC. Construction drawing design of landslide treatment project in the north of Building 8 of LANYA·Xinghewan residential district [R]. Lanzhou: 2017. (in Chinese)
    王雷, 吴君平, 赵冰雪, 等. 基于GIS和信息量模型的安徽池州地质灾害易发性评价[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2020, 31(3): 96−103.

    WANG Lei, WU Junping, ZHAO Bingxue, et al. Susceptibility assessment of geohazards in Chizhou City of Anhui Province based on GIS and informative model[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2020, 31(3): 96−103. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    王齐鑫, 王龙平, 王泽宇. 安徽阜阳中心城区地面沉降灾害风险评价[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2019, 30(4) : 32−39.

    WANG Qixin, WANG Longping, WANG Zeyu. Risk assessment of land subsidence in central area of Fuyang City, Anhui Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2019, 30(4): 32−39. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    方然可, 刘艳辉, 苏永超, 等. 基于逻辑回归的四川青川县区域滑坡灾害预警模型[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2021,48(1) : 181−187.

    FANG Ranke, LIU Yanhui, SU Yongchao, etal. A early warning model of regional landslide in Qingchuan County, Sichuan Province based on logistic regression[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2021,48(1): 181−187. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    郭伟, 王晨辉, 李鹏, 等. 基于LoRa的地质灾害分布式实时监测系统设计[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2020,47(4): 107−113.

    GUO Wei, WANG Chenhui, LI Peng, etal. Design of the distributed real-time monitoring system for geological hazards based on LoRa[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2020, 47(4): 107−113. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    张茂省.发挥新型举国体制优势 提高地质灾害防治能力[J]. 西北地质, 2019, 52(2): Ⅰ-Ⅱ.

    ZHANG Maosheng. Maximising the advantages of the new national system for improving the ability to prevent and mitigate geological disasters[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2019, 52(2): Ⅰ-Ⅱ. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    张茂省, 薛强, 贾俊, 等. 山区城镇地质灾害调查与风险评价方法及实践[J]. 西北地质, 2019, 52(2): 125−135.

    ZHANG Maosheng, XUE Qiang, JIA Jun, etal. Methods and practices for the investigation and risk assessment of geo-hazards in mountainous towns[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2019, 52(2): 125−135. (in Chinese with English abstract)
  • 加载中
图(10) / 表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  114
  • HTML全文浏览量:  105
  • PDF下载量:  73
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-09-28
  • 修回日期:  2020-11-04
  • 刊出日期:  2021-04-27

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回