ISSN 1003-8035 CN 11-2852/P

    刚度比影响坡脚正-负斜双排桩工程特性数值研究

    Numerical study on engineering characteristics of positive-negative inclined double-row piles at embankment slope toe under different stiffness ratios

    • 摘要: 路堤荷载下,路基常发生较大的侧向变形,有必要设置合适的侧向约束结构。正-负斜双排斜桩在基坑工程中已有研究,但在路基工程中少见报道,工程特性尚不明确。本文以广东惠州至肇庆高速公路试验路段为研究对象,采用Plaxis3D数值分析软件进行1∶1数值建模,将正-负斜双排桩计算模型简化为受侧向均布荷载的平面刚架,分析路堤荷载下后排正斜桩与前排负斜桩刚度比对正-负斜双排桩水平位移和桩身弯矩的影响规律,利用位移法分析验证其弯矩峰值比随刚度比变化规律。结果表明:(1)正、负斜桩刚度相同时,桩身水平位移均由桩顶向下先增大后减小,后排正斜桩位移峰值为前排负斜桩的1.2倍;正、负斜桩弯矩随深度变化曲线均呈反“S”型,后排正斜桩弯矩显著大于前排负斜桩,正弯矩峰值均出现在1/4倍桩长处;(2)若保持前排负斜桩刚度不变,刚度比增大,前排负斜桩水平位移峰值和弯矩峰值减小,后排正斜桩水平位移峰值减小、弯矩峰值增大。弯矩峰值比随刚度比增大而增大。若保持后排桩刚度不变,刚度比增大,前排桩水平位移峰值增大、弯矩峰值减小,后排桩水平位移峰值和弯矩峰值增大;(3)后排正斜桩与前排负斜桩的刚度比达到9左右,桩身弯矩峰值比与刚度比的比值接近1,弯矩分配最为合理。工程中,增大前排负斜桩刚度是不利的。建议将后排正斜桩刚度增大到前排正斜桩刚度的9倍左右,以抵抗其承担的较大弯矩。研究结果为坡脚处正-负斜双排桩设计提供依据。

       

      Abstract: Under embankment load, subgrade tends to produce large lateral deformation, and it is necessary to adopt reasonable lateral restraint structures. Positive-negative inclined double-row piles have been studied in foundation pit engineering, but are rarely reported in subgrade engineering, and their engineering characteristics remain unclear. Taking the test section of the Huizhou-Zhaoqing Expressway in Guangdong Province as the research object, a 1∶1 numerical model was built with Plaxis3D software. The positive-negative inclined double-row pile was simplified as a planar rigid frame under lateral uniform load. The influences of the stiffness ratio between the rear positive inclined piles and front negative inclined piles on the horizontal displacement and bending moment of piles under embankment load were analyzed, and the variation of peak bending moment ratio with stiffness ratio was verified by the displacement method. The results show that: (1) When the stiffness of positive and negative inclined piles is equal, the horizontal displacement of piles first increases and then decreases downward from the pile top. The peak displacement of the rear positive inclined pile is 1.2 times that of the front negative inclined pile. The bending moment of positive and negative inclined piles presents an inverted “S” shape with depth. The bending moment of the rear positive inclined pile is significantly larger than that of the front negative inclined pile, and the peak positive bending moment occurs at 1/4 of the pile length. (2) Keeping the stiffness of the front negative inclined pile constant, increasing the stiffness ratio reduces the peak displacement and peak bending moment of the front pile, decreases the peak displacement of the rear pile, and increases its peak bending moment, leading to a larger peak bending moment ratio. Keeping the stiffness of the rear pile constant, increasing the stiffness ratio increases the peak displacement of the front pile and reduces its peak bending moment, while both the peak displacement and peak bending moment of the rear pile increase. (3) When the stiffness ratio of the rear positive inclined pile to the front negative inclined pile is about 9, the ratio of peak bending moment ratio to stiffness ratio is close to 1, indicating the optimal bending moment distribution. Increasing the stiffness of the front negative inclined pile is unfavorable in engineering. It is suggested that the stiffness of the rear positive inclined pile be increased to about 9 times that of the front pile to resist greater bending moment. The research results can provide a basis for the design of positive-negative inclined double-row piles at the slope toe.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回