ISSN 1003-8035 CN 11-2852/P

    强降雨条件下细粒堆填黄土边坡不同加筋材料防渗抑蚀试验研究

    Experimental Study on the Anti-Seepage and Erosion-Control Performance of Fine-Grained Loess-Fill Slopes Reinforced with Different Materials under Intense Rainfall

    • 摘要:
      目的 为揭示强降雨作用下不同加筋材料对细粒堆填黄土边坡入渗过程、吸力消散、湿润锋推进及坡面侵蚀破坏的调控机制,评价不同筋材的防渗抑蚀效果。
      方法 以兰州市城关区碱水沟典型堆填黄土为研究对象,建立室内人工强降雨模型试验平台,设置自然堆积、土工布、土工格栅和秸秆层4种工况,模拟125 mm/h强降雨条件下边坡土水参数与坡面破坏过程的演化特征,监测体积含水率、基质吸力、湿润锋推进、塌陷深度、侵蚀率和裂隙发育等指标。
      结果 不同加筋材料对堆填黄土边坡水分入渗和侵蚀破坏过程具有明显调控作用。土工布工况体积含水率响应最早、变化速率较快,坡面局部汇流和塌陷较明显,防渗效果相对较弱;土工格栅可延缓部分测点吸力消散和破坏发生时间,但峰值侵蚀率较高,表现出一定的滞后突变特征;秸秆层可有效延缓坡底入渗响应,减缓基质吸力消散,抑制湿润锋向深部推进,并降低坡面侵蚀和裂隙发育程度。秸秆层工况总侵蚀量为187.9 g,较自然堆积工况降低15.9%,120 min时裂隙总长较自然堆积工况降低61.4%。
      结论 不同加筋材料通过改变水分入渗路径、吸力消散过程和坡面径流分布,进而影响堆填黄土边坡的侵蚀破坏模式。综合坡底入渗响应、湿润锋推进、吸力消散、塌陷深度、侵蚀率和裂隙发育等指标,秸秆层防渗抑蚀效果最优,土工格栅次之,土工布相对较弱。研究结果可为强降雨条件下堆填黄土边坡生态型加筋防护与水土保持措施优化提供试验依据。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective This study aims to reveal how different reinforcement materials regulate infiltration, matric-suction dissipation, wetting-front advancement, and slope-surface erosion failure in fine-grained loess-fill slopes under intense rainfall, and to evaluate their anti-seepage and erosion-control performance.
      Methods Typical loess fill from Jianshuigou, Chengguan District, Lanzhou City, was used to establish an indoor artificial intense-rainfall model-test platform. Four test conditions were designed: natural accumulation, geotextile, geogrid, and straw layer. The evolution of soil-water parameters and slope-surface failure processes was simulated under an intense rainfall condition of 125 mm/h. Volumetric water content, matric suction, wetting-front advancement, collapse depth, erosion rate, and crack development were monitored.
      Results Different reinforcement materials exerted clear regulatory effects on water infiltration and erosion failure in loess-fill slopes. Under the geotextile condition, volumetric water content responded earliest and changed rapidly, while local runoff concentration and slope-surface collapse were relatively evident, indicating a comparatively weak anti-seepage effect. The geogrid delayed matric-suction dissipation at some monitoring points and postponed failure, but its peak erosion rate was relatively high, showing a delayed abrupt-change behavior. The straw layer effectively delayed infiltration response at the slope toe, slowed matric-suction dissipation, inhibited wetting-front advancement into deeper parts, and reduced slope-surface erosion and crack development. Under the straw-layer condition, the total erosion amount was 187.9 g, 15.9% lower than that under natural accumulation. At 120 min, the total crack length was reduced by 61.4% relative to natural accumulation.
      Conclusions Different reinforcement materials affect erosion-failure modes of loess-fill slopes by changing infiltration paths, matric-suction dissipation, and slope-surface runoff distribution. Considering slope-toe infiltration response, wetting-front advancement, matric-suction dissipation, collapse depth, erosion rate, and crack development, the straw layer shows the best anti-seepage and erosion-control performance, followed by the geogrid, whereas the geotextile performs relatively weakly. The results provide an experimental basis for optimizing ecological reinforced protection and soil-water conservation measures for loess-fill slopes under intense rainfall.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回