ISSN 1003-8035 CN 11-2852/P
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CSCD收录期刊
  • Caj-cd规范获奖期刊
  • Scopus 收录期刊
  • DOAJ 收录期刊
  • GeoRef收录期刊
欢迎扫码关注“i环境微平台”

泥石流致灾因子敏感性分析——以四川都江堰龙溪河流域为例

李彩侠, 马煜, 何元勋

李彩侠, 马煜, 何元勋. 泥石流致灾因子敏感性分析——以四川都江堰龙溪河流域为例[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2020, 31(5): 32-39. DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2020.05.05
引用本文: 李彩侠, 马煜, 何元勋. 泥石流致灾因子敏感性分析——以四川都江堰龙溪河流域为例[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2020, 31(5): 32-39. DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2020.05.05
LI Caixia, MA Yu, HE Yuanxun. Sensitivity analysis of debris flow to environmental factors: a case of Longxi River basin in Dujiangyan, Sichuan Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2020, 31(5): 32-39. DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2020.05.05
Citation: LI Caixia, MA Yu, HE Yuanxun. Sensitivity analysis of debris flow to environmental factors: a case of Longxi River basin in Dujiangyan, Sichuan Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2020, 31(5): 32-39. DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2020.05.05

泥石流致灾因子敏感性分析——以四川都江堰龙溪河流域为例

基金项目: 

四川省教育厅科研基金重点项目(18ZA0076);成都理工大学工程技术学院青年基金(C122018022,C122017009)

详细信息
    作者简介:

    李彩侠(1986-),女,陕西渭南人,地质学专业,讲师,硕士,主要从事地质学和地质工程方面的教学和科研工作。E-mail:licaixiac@126.com

    通讯作者:

    马煜(1984-),男,陕西杨陵人,地质工程专业,副教授,博士生,主要从事地质工程和岩土工程方面的教学和科研工作。E-mail:mayu.2008@hotmail.com

  • 中图分类号: P642.23

Sensitivity analysis of debris flow to environmental factors: a case of Longxi River basin in Dujiangyan, Sichuan Province

  • 摘要: 泥石流是我国山区常见的地质灾害,为了定量研究泥石流灾害致灾因子的敏感性并确定各个致灾因子的权重大小,本文通过野外调查、数理统计法和层次分析法对龙溪河流域泥石流灾害的主要致灾因子进行定性规律分析和定量权重计算。结果表明:(1)泥石流灾害的发生与致灾因子的敏感性区间主要定性表现为:流域面积小于1 km2以内、高差在200~400 m范围内、距断层距离为0~2 km、山坡坡度30°~50°、岩性为砂岩、纵比降在400‰~600‰等,其泥石流发生与致灾因子具有相关性,且相关性较好;(2)选取了泥石流灾害致灾因子中的历史因子、地形因子、地质因子和降雨因子等4个一级因子以及流域面积、高程、相对高差、纵坡比、地层岩性等14个二级因子建立层次分析模型和计算判断矩阵,定量计算权重值得出降雨,流域面积,地层岩性,纵比降等四个因子对泥石流发生的敏感性最强。这一结论具有普遍性,可对该区域泥石流的易发性,危险性,风险性评价提供一定的数据参考意义。
    Abstract: Debris flow is a common geological hazard in mountainous areas. In order to quantitatively study the sensitivity of disaster-causing factors of debris flow and determine the weight coefficient of each hazard factors. The field investigation, mathematical statistics and analytic hierarchy process were used to study qualitatively and quantitative weights of hazard-causing factors in Longxi River Basin. The results show that:(1) the qualitative analysis between the occurrence of debris flow disasters and the susceptibility factors of hazards are as follows:the watershed area is less than 1 km2, the height difference is within 200 to 400 m, the distance from the fault is 0 to 2 km, and the slope of the slope is 30°~50°, the lithology is sandstone, the vertical ratio drops between 400‰ to 600‰, etc., the occurrence of debris flow disasters is well relevance to its main disaster-causing.(2) Four primary factors, including historical factor, topographic factor, geological factor and rainfall factor, as well as 14 secondary factors, such as watershed area, elevation, relative elevation difference, longitudinal slope ratio and stratigraphic lithology, are selected to establish the analytic hierarchy process model and the calculation judgment matrix. Obtains the weight value of disaster-causing factors on debris flow occurrence, which indicates that the four factors of rainfall, watershed area, stratigraphic lithology, and aspect ratio are the most sensitive to debris flow occurrence. This conclusion provides some data reference significance for the susceptibility, risk, and risk assessment of debris flow in the region.
  • [1] 刘希林.泥石流危险度的判定和研究[J].灾害学,1988,3(3):10-15.

    [LIU X L. Research of debris flow risk decision[J]. Journal of Catastrophology,1988,3(3):10-15.(in Chinese)]

    [2] 马金辉, 田菲, 陈璐. 基于优势分析法的泥石流影响因子相对重要性分析——以白龙江流域为例[J]. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 50(5):722-727.[MA J H, TIAN F, CHEN L. Relative importance analysis of debris flow factors based on dominance analysis:a case study of the Bailongjiang Basin in China[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Science), 2014, 50(5):722-727.(in Chinese)]
    [3] 刘希林, 唐川, 张松林. 中国山区沟谷泥石流危险度的定量判定法[J]. 灾害学, 1993, 8(2):1-7.

    [LIU X L, TANG C, ZHANG S L. Quantitaive judgment on the debris flow risk degree[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 1993, 8(2):1-7.(in Chinese)]

    [4] 铁永波, 唐川. 层次分析法在单沟泥石流危险度评价中的应用[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2006, 17(4):79-84.

    [TIE Y B, TANG C. Application of AHP in single debris flow risk assessment[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2006, 17(4):79-84.(in Chinese)]

    [5]

    LAN H,WU F,ZHOU C,et al. Analysis on susceptibility of GIS based landslide triggering factors in Yunnan Xiaojiang watershed[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2002, 21:1500-1506.

    [6]

    OHLMACHER G C, DAVIS J C. Using multiple logistic regression and GIS technology to predict landslide hazard in northeast Kansas, USA[J]. Engineering Geology, 2003, 69(3):331-343.

    [7] 陈莉. 小流域尺度泥石流灾害风险分析[D]. 绵阳:西南科技大学, 2016.[CHEN L. The risk analysis of debris flow disaster in small watershed scale[D]. Mianyang, China:Southwest University of Science and Technology, 2016.(in Chinese)]
    [8] 张自光, 张志明, 张顺斌. 都江堰市八一沟泥石流形成条件与动力学特征分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2010, 21(1):34-38.

    [ZHANG Z G, ZHANG Z M, ZHANG S B. Formation conditions and dynamics features of the debris flow in Bayi Gully in Dujiangyan County[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2010, 21(1):34-38.(in Chinese)]

    [9] 亓星, 余斌, 王涛. 沟道坡度对泥石流起动模式影响的模拟试验研究[J]. 水电能源科学, 2014, 32(7):116-119.

    [QI X, YU B, WANG T. Simulation test of impact of gully slope on starting model of debris flow[J]. International Journal Hydroelectric Energy, 2014, 32(7):116-119.(in Chinese)]

    [10] 余斌, 王涛, 朱渊. 浅层滑坡诱发沟谷泥石流的地形和降雨条件[J]. 水科学进展, 2016, 27(4):542-550.

    [YU B, WANG T, ZHU Y. Research on the topographical and rainfall factors of debris flows caused by shallow landslides[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2016, 27(4):542-550.(in Chinese)]

    [11] 马煜, 李彩侠. 地形因子对四川龙溪河流域泥石流发生的影响[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2018, 29(2):16-21.

    [MA Y, LI C X. Effect of topographic factor on the formation of debris flows in Longxi River Area, Sichuan Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2018, 29(2):16-21.(in Chinese)]

    [12] 李彩侠, 马煜. 地形因子对白水河流域泥石流易发性的影响[J]. 中国科技论文, 2018, 13(9):1036-1040.

    [LI C X, MA Y. Influence of topographic factor on debris flow susceptibility in Baishui River area[J]. China Science paper, 2018, 13(9):1036-1040.(in Chinese)]

    [13] 熊俊楠, 韦方强, 刘志奇. 四川省小流域泥石流危险性评价[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2017, 19(12):1604-1612.

    [XIONG J N, WEI F Q, LIU Z Q. Hazard assessment of debris flow in Sichuan Province[J]. Geo-Information Science, 2017, 19(12):1604-1612.(in Chinese)]

    [14] 张继. 泥石流对岩性的敏感性研究——以小江流域为例[D]. 成都:中国科学院·水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所, 2008.[ZHANG J. Study on sensitivity of debris flow to lithology-taking Xiaojiang River Basin as an example[D]. Chengdu:Chengdu Institute of Mountain Disasters and Environment, Ministry of Water Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2008.(in Chinese)]
    [15] 谭万沛, 陈英燕, 王成华,等. 孙水河流域降水量对泥石流灾害的影响[J]. 土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报, 1998(1):81-87.[TAN W P, CHEN Y Y, WANG C H, et al. Precipitation features in sunshuihe basin and their impacts on mountain disasters[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1998

    (1):81-87.(in Chinese)]

    [16] 吴赛儿.强震区泥石流易发性研究[D]. 北京:中国地质大学(北京),2018.[WU S E. Study on the susceptibility of debris flow in strong earthquake areas[D]. Beijing:China University of Geosciences (Beijing), 2018.(in Chinese)]
    [17] 许树柏. 实用决策方法层次分析法原理[M]. 天津:天津大学出版社, 1988:145-165.[XU S B. Principle of analytic hierarchy process[M]. Tianjin:Tianjin University Press, 1988:145

    -165.(in Chinese)]

    [18] 张具琴, 李少达, 杨武年, 等. 基于3S技术的泥石流影响因子权重分析[J]. 地理空间信息, 2016, 14(3):70-72.

    [ZHANG J Q, LI S D, YANG W N, et al. Analysis of impact factor indexes weight of debris flow based on 3S techniques[J]. Geospatial Information, 2016, 14(3):70-72.(in Chinese)]

    [19] 田丰, 张军, 冉有华, 等. 甘肃陇南市泥石流灾害危险性及影响因子评价[J]. 灾害学, 2017, 32(3):197-203.

    [TIAN F, ZHANG J, RAN Y H, et al. Assessment of debris flow disaster hazard and influence factors in Longnan district[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2017, 32(3):197-203.(in Chinese)]

  • 期刊类型引用(8)

    1. 罗雨梦,王保云,袁若浩,王旭,刘存熙,陈跨越. 融合注意力机制的双通道网络及其在沟谷型泥石流易发性评价中的应用. 中国地质灾害与防治学报. 2025(01): 156-168 . 本站查看
    2. 周贲,尚中堂,龚红胜,钟延江,陈刚,宗吉松,田雨. 基于RAMMS数值模拟的巴坡村泥石流危险性评价. 城市勘测. 2025(02): 217-224 . 百度学术
    3. 饶姗姗,冷小鹏. 基于RSIV-RF模型的凉山州泥石流易发性评价. 地质科技通报. 2024(01): 275-287 . 百度学术
    4. 王翔弘绅,胡桂胜,杨志全,倪化勇. 云南维西哈达沟中频泥石流特征及堵溃危险性分析. 中国地质灾害与防治学报. 2023(02): 42-52 . 本站查看
    5. 刘兴荣,张满银,周自强,宿星,叶伟林,文桃,张国信,刘迪. 中巴公路(国内段)泥石流演化的非线性特征与灾害放大效应. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(03): 364-371 . 百度学术
    6. 强德霞,马海政,朱自平,苟彦梅. 甘肃省积石山县泥石流空间分布及分析. 测绘通报. 2022(07): 107-111+117 . 百度学术
    7. 张友谊,钟磊,樊晓一,顾成壮,田述军. 岷江河谷锄头沟震后泥石流致灾模式. 山地学报. 2021(05): 756-766 . 百度学术
    8. 李小龙,宋国虎,向灵芝,罗亮,唐良琴,沈娜,梁梦辉. 基于不同评价单元和灾害熵的泥石流危险性分析——以白龙江流域武都段为例. 中国地质灾害与防治学报. 2021(06): 107-115 . 本站查看

    其他类型引用(5)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  432
  • HTML全文浏览量:  160
  • PDF下载量:  430
  • 被引次数: 13
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-02-14
  • 修回日期:  2020-04-08
  • 网络出版日期:  2021-01-21

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回