ISSN 1003-8035 CN 11-2852/P
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CSCD收录期刊
  • Caj-cd规范获奖期刊
欢迎扫码关注“i环境微平台”

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

河南省嵩县地质灾害风险评价

王俊德 杜晓阳 黄天浩 周晓鹏 孙乐飞 韩新志 董利伟

王俊德,杜晓阳,黄天浩,等. 河南省嵩县地质灾害风险评价[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2023,34(0): 1-10 doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202209005
引用本文: 王俊德,杜晓阳,黄天浩,等. 河南省嵩县地质灾害风险评价[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2023,34(0): 1-10 doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202209005
WANG Junde,DU Xiaoyang,HUANG Tianhao,et al. Risk assessment of geological hazards in Song County, Henan Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2023,34(0): 1-10 doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202209005
Citation: WANG Junde,DU Xiaoyang,HUANG Tianhao,et al. Risk assessment of geological hazards in Song County, Henan Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2023,34(0): 1-10 doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202209005

河南省嵩县地质灾害风险评价

doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202209005
基金项目: 2021年度中央自然灾害防治体系建设补助资金项目《河南省嵩县1∶5万地质灾害风险调查(普查)评价》(豫财招标采购-2021-929-包10)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    王俊德(1980-),男,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事地质矿产、地质水工环及地质灾害等方面研究工作。E-mail:909902492@qq.com

Risk assessment of geological hazards in Song County, Henan Province

  • 摘要: 基于ArcGIS环境下,通过选取河南省嵩县区域高程、地貌、工程岩组、植被覆盖度、距构造距离、距水系距离、坡度、坡向等 8个因子建立危险性评价模型,易损性选取建筑物、人员和交通等 3 个承灾因子,分别采用信息量模型和层次分析法对河南省嵩县区域进行地质灾害易发性、危险性和易损性评价。研究结果表明,嵩县区域划分为低风险区面积为965.34 km2,占嵩县区域面积32%;中风险区面积为1114.65 km2,占嵩县区域面积的37%;高风险区面积为826.23 km2,占嵩县区域面积的27%;极高风险区面积为102.68 km2,占嵩县区域面积的3%。研究成果可应用于嵩县防灾、减灾及地质灾害风险管控等方面。
  • 图  1  研究区地质灾害

    Figure  1.  Site photos of geological hazards in the study area

    图  2  研究区地质构造简图

    1:第四系 2:中新统洛阳组 3:下白垩统九店组 4:下古生界二郎坪群 5:上元古界栾川群 6:中—上元古界宽坪群 7:中元古界熊耳群鸡蛋坪组 8:中元古界熊耳群马家河组-鸡蛋坪组并层 9:太古界太华群 10:花岗岩 11:陆浑水库 12:正断层及编号 13:逆断层及编号 14:性质不明断层 15:乡界 16:县界 17:县政府所在地 18:镇(乡)政府所在地

    Figure  2.  Geological structure sketch map of the study area

    图  3  嵩县地质灾害隐患点分布图

    Figure  3.  Distribution map of geological hazard potential sites in Song county

    图  4  嵩县地质灾害易发性分区结果图

    Figure  4.  Results of geological hazard susceptibility zoning in Song county

    图  5  月累计降雨量归一化结果

    Figure  5.  Normalized results of monthly cumulative rainfall in the study area

    图  6  易发性归一化结果

    Figure  6.  Normalized results of susceptibility in the study area

    图  7  嵩县地质灾害危险性分区结果图

    Figure  7.  Geological hazard risk zoning results in Song county

    图  8  承载体易损性分级结果图

    Figure  8.  Vulnerability classification results of bearing body

    图  9  嵩县地质灾害易损性分区结果图

    Figure  9.  Geological hazard vulnerability zoning results in Song County

    图  10  嵩县地质灾害风险分区图

    Figure  10.  Geological hazard risk zoning map of Song county

    表  1  易发性评价因子分级及信息量值

    Table  1.   Classification and information value of susceptibility assessment factors

    评价因子指标分级Ni/NSi/S信息量值
    高程0-5000.38000.21460.5715
    500-10000.58000.56200.0316
    1000−15000.04000.1952−1.5854
    >15000.00000.02820.0000
    地貌河谷0.05580.0609−0.0883
    中山0.29880.3985−0.2879
    低山0.31830.31760.0037
    丘陵0.32670.22300.3817
    工程岩组坚硬花岗岩岩组0.15200.3001−0.6803
    坚硬片麻岩岩组0.02800.0563−0.6992
    软弱粘性土岩组0.10000.08810.1268
    较软弱砾岩岩组0.03600.01640.7832
    较坚硬砂岩页岩互层岩组0.01600.01130.3452
    较软弱砂质砾岩岩组0.18800.11780.4674
    坚硬安山岩类岩组0.30800.3421−0.1049
    较软弱石英云母片岩岩组0.15200.04551.2065
    较坚硬硅质板岩岩组0.01200.0145−0.1910
    较软弱页岩岩组0.00400.00210.6393
    较坚硬灰岩岩组0.00400.0057−0.3503
    植被覆盖度0−0.50.10040.05530.5967
    0.5−0.650.51000.29450.5493
    0.65−0.750.31330.3799−0.1928
    0.75−10.07630.2704−1.2651
    距构造距离0−5000.50000.30650.4892
    500−10000.19600.19050.0286
    1000−15000.13200.12410.0616
    1500−20000.04800.0903−0.6318
    >20000.12400.2886−0.8446
    距水系距离0−5000.78000.54900.3512
    500−10000.12000.2563−0.7588
    1000−15000.06000.1101−0.6069
    1500−20000.02400.0415−0.5476
    >20000.01600.0431−0.9919
    坡度0−100.06800.1321−0.6637
    10−250.32000.21170.4133
    25−400.29600.29360.0082
    >400.31600.3627−0.1378
    坡向FLAT(−1)0.00000.01060.0000
    N(337.5−22.5°)0.06800.1427−0.7415
    NE(22.5−67.5°)0.14800.13520.0903
    E(67.5−112.5°)0.13600.11300.1856
    SE(112.5−157.5°)0.17200.11640.3901
    S(157.5−202.5°)0.21600.16300.2814
    SW(202.5−247.5°)0.12400.12360.0032
    W(247.5−292.5°)0.08400.0922−0.0928
    NW(292.5−337.5°)0.05200.1033−0.6862
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  嵩县1992-2021年降雨量统计表(单位: mm)

    Table  2.   Statistical table of Rainfall level in Song county from 1992 - 2021

    年份1992199319941995199619971998199920002001
    年降雨量576.90675.20529.60470.70959.10418.10773.10589.90760.30433.10
    月平均降雨量48.0856.2744.1339.2379.9334.8464.4349.16231.5036.09
    年份2002200320042005200620072008200920102011
    年降雨量657.601067.40690.90718.40636.70565.10558.80764.30924.00931.50
    月平均降雨量54.8088.9557.5859.8753.0647.0946.5763.6977.0077.63
    年份2012201320142015201620172018201920202021
    年降雨量649.50518.60674.10594.80562.70745.30690.10690.10642.50944.40
    月平均降雨量54.1343.2256.1849.5746.8962.1157.5153.2653.54145.29
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  承灾体易损性赋值表

    Table  3.   Vulnerability evaluation table for disaster-bearing bodies

    承灾体类型分级赋值
    受地质灾害直接威胁人口数量10 - 100人0.4
    <10人0.2
    交通设施高速公路0.8
    国家级公路0.7
    省级公路0.4
    其他道路0.25
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 齐信,唐川,陈州丰,等. 地质灾害风险评价研究[J]. 自然灾害学报,2012,21(5):33 − 40. [QI Xin,TANG Chuan,CHEN Zhoufeng,et al. Research of geohazards risk assessment[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters,2012,21(5):33 − 40. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [2] MANTOVANI F,SOETERS R,VAN WESTEN C J. Remote sensing techniques for landslide studies and hazard zonation in Europe[J]. Geomorphology,1996,15(3/4):213 − 225.
    [3] MICHAEL-LEIBA M,BAYNES F,SCOTT G,et al. Regional landslide risk to the Cairns community[J]. Natural Hazards,2003,30(2):233 − 249. doi: 10.1023/A:1026122518661
    [4] UROMEIHY A,MAHDAVIFAR M R. Landslide hazard zonation of the khorshrostam area,Iran[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment,2000,58(3):207 − 213. doi: 10.1007/s100640050076
    [5] ALEOTTI P,CHOWDHURY R. Landslide hazard assessment:summary review and new perspectives[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment,1999,58(1):21 − 44. doi: 10.1007/s100640050066
    [6] Einstein H H. Landslide risk-systenatic approaches to assessment and management[C]//In: Cruden D. and Fell R. ( eds. ) , Landslide Risk Assessment. Rotterdam: Balkema, 1997: 25 − 50.
    [7] VAN WESTEN C. Geo-Information tools for landslide risk assessment: An overview of recent developments[M]//Landslides: Evaluation and Stabilization/Glissement de Terrain: Evaluation et Stabilisation, Set of 2 Volumes. CRC Press, 2004: 39 − 56.
    [8] 罗路广,裴向军,谷虎,等. 基于GIS的“8·8”九寨沟地震景区地质灾害风险评价[J]. 自然灾害学报,2020,29(3):193 − 202. [LUO Luguang,PEI Xiangjun,GU Hu,et al. Risk assessment of geohazards induced by “8·8” earthquake based on GIS in Jiuzhaigou scenic area[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters,2020,29(3):193 − 202. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [9] 高克昌,崔鹏,赵纯勇,等. 基于地理信息系统和信息量模型的滑坡危险性评价—以重庆万州为例[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2006,25(5):991 − 996. [GAO Kechang,CUI Peng,ZHAO Chunyong,et al. Landslide hazard evaluation of Wanzhou based on GIS information value method in the Three Gorges Reservoir[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2006,25(5):991 − 996. (in Chinese)
    [10] 阮沈勇,黄润秋. 基于GIS的信息量法模型在地质灾害危险性区划中的应用[J]. 成都理工学院学报,2001,28(1):89 − 92. [RUAN Shenyong,HUANG Runqiu. Application of gis-based information model on assessment of g eological hazards risk[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology,2001,28(1):89 − 92. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [11] 刘福臻,王灵,肖东升. 机器学习模型在滑坡易发性评价中的应用[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2021,32(6):98 − 106. [LIU Fuzhen,WANG Ling,XIAO Dongsheng. Application of machine learning model in landslide susceptibility evaluation[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2021,32(6):98 − 106. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [12] 倪晓娇,南颖. 基于GIS的长白山地区地质灾害风险综合评估[J]. 自然灾害学报,2014,23(1):112 − 120. [NI Xiaojiao,NAN Ying. Comprehensive assessment of geological disasters risk in Changbai Mountain region based on GIS[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters,2014,23(1):112 − 120. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [13] 冯凡,唐亚明,潘学树,等. 不同尺度下地质灾害风险评价方法探讨—以陕西吴堡县为例[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2022,33(2):115 − 124. [FENG Fan,TANG Yaming,PAN Xueshu,et al. An attempt of risk assessment of geological hazards in different scales:A case study in Wubao County of Shaanxi Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2022,33(2):115 − 124. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [14] 李阳春,刘黔云,李潇,等. 基于机器学习的滑坡崩塌地质灾害气象风险预警研究[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2021,32(3):118 − 123. [LI Yangchun,LIU Qianyun,LI Xiao,et al. Exploring early warning and forecasting of meteorological risk of landslide and rockfall induced by meteorological factors by the approach of machine learning[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2021,32(3):118 − 123. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [15] 乔建平,王萌,石莉莉. 区域滑坡风险评估中的风险区划与概率分析[J]. 自然灾害学报,2012,21(2):51 − 56. [QIAO Jianping,WANG Meng,SHI Lili. Risk zoning and probability analysis of regional landslide risk assessment[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters,2012,21(2):51 − 56. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [16] 刘希林. 泥石流风险评价中若干问题的探讨[J]. 山地学报,2000,18(4):341 − 345. [LIU Xilin. Approaches to risk assessment of debris flow[J]. Journal of Mountain Research,2000,18(4):341 − 345. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [17] 王嘉君,何亚伯,杨琳,等. 基于GIS的山区村镇多灾种耦合风险评估[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2018,29(1):102 − 112. [WANG Jiajun,HE Yabo,YANG Lin,et al. Comprehensive multi-hazard risk assessment of villages and towns in mountain areas based on GIS[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2018,29(1):102 − 112. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [18] 刘传正. 论地质灾害风险识别问题[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2017,44(4):1 − 7. [LIU Chuanzheng. Research on the risk recognition of geological disasters[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2017,44(4):1 − 7. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [19] 刘传正. 崩塌滑坡灾害风险识别方法初步研究[J]. 工程地质学报,2019,27(1):88 − 97. [LIU Chuanzheng. Analysis methods on the risk identification of landslide disasters[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2019,27(1):88 − 97. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [20] Alexander E D, Natural Disasters[M]. London: UCL Press Limited, 1993: 1 − 632.
  • 加载中
图(10) / 表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  330
  • HTML全文浏览量:  177
  • PDF下载量:  24
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-09-05
  • 录用日期:  2023-05-04
  • 修回日期:  2023-04-12
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-05-14

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回